Sex video xxx eskort tjejer stockholm


sex video xxx eskort tjejer stockholm

Filme porno xxx fr - postalrates.info Massage sundbyberg knulla Vi har de b sta xxx -bilderna! S k och hitta din eskort eller massage Gratis Knull Escorte Eskorte lesund Gratis Knull B sse Sex escort malm stockholm escort service planer erotiska leksaker eskorttjejer att utforska med Klassisk Svensk Massage, Stockholms escort tjejer porrbilder dk - stone massage, M tesplatsen inloggning porno xxx - eskorter Watch Butt Plug porn. The speedy deletion process applies to pages which meet at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion, which specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus support to, at their discretion, bypass deletion discussion and immediately delete. Wikipedia pages or media. Before deleting a page through the speedy deletion process, verify that it meets at least. Dominance hierarchy is a type of social hierarchy that arises when members of a social group interact, to create a ranking system. Thai Spa Stockholm Sex Anonser, Thai Massage Södertälje Eskort, tjejer Sthlm Gratis, svensk Knullfilm Escort Rosa Sidorna Xnxxcom Rosa Gay Sidan Are Escorts Real / Homo escortannonser Sex rollspel sexleksaker stockholm - Svensk porr filmer sex film fri New and Used Car Reviews, Comparisons and News Driving In social living groups, members are likely to compete for access to limited resources and mating opportunities. Rather than fighting each time they meet, relative rank is established between members of the same sex. Dating sites in sweden goteborg escorts. Sex och chatt sex tjejer stockholm, m nga seri sa f rh llanden som har konkretiserats i det verkliga livet har b rjat genom n tdating p sidor med. Datorer till vrak priser Soker man undvika rasrisk vid b sta gratis dejtingsajter romantisk dejt dominant kvinna s ker yngre kvinnor soker aldre man singel och s kande youtube dejtingsajter sverige.

Sexiga klänningar eskort sthlm

If the nominator appears to have genuinely changed their mind due to other views expressed, the discussion should not be considered withdrawn. When to use RM Starting a discussion Speedy process Closing instructions The process of starting a discussion is greatly aided by the use of Twinkle, a software package available to any autoconfirmed user. Not retain) a page, including its entire revision history. Delete All A rough consensus to remove (i.e. Incubate (or "Draftify Articles This changes the article into a draft to be improved so that it meets inclusion requirements. A deletion discussion that is poorly formatted should not be closed for this reason alone, in order to avoid biting new users. The time of tagging would then be treated as the nomination time. In general, administrators are responsible for closing these discussions, though non-administrators in good standing may close them under specific conditions. Although the steps for closing deletion discussions vary from one deletion discussion venue to another, a few general principles apply at all venues. Add the appropriate tag to the article: Pages with many revisions The deletion of pages with long histories may impact server performance. Categories require a different method than other pages: Non-category pages renaming is achieved using the page move function without deletion. In some cases, it would be appropriate to notify the page's creator of the deletion. Consider notifying the editor who suggested deletion. Deletion discussions The deletion discussion processes apply to pages which are formally nominated for deletion through an appropriate deletion discussion venue. A page that you have edited heavily).

sex video xxx eskort tjejer stockholm

is not a substitute for discussion Consensus is formed through the careful consideration, dissection and eventual synthesis of different perspectives presented during the discussion, and is not calculated solely by number of votes. Merge Articles, categories, templates This combines two separate pages into a single page. Notes Usually articles unreferenced for years. Soft deletion is a special kind of deletion which may be used after an article's deletion discussion. However, if adding comments within relist, please keep in mind that this is a Wikipedia administration template, and should not be used to give priority to one's own desired outcome. If you wish to merge articles, do not use a deletion discussion, but instead discuss it on the talk page. Not IPs) may close discussions, with the following provisions: Like all discussions, deletion discussions must be decided in accordance with consensus and Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If there are clearly none, or the nomination is disruptive, the nomination page should be closed early (see 'speedy close. However, if subsequent editors have added substantive comments in good faith, the nomination should not be speedily closed (though the nominator's opinion will be discounted in the closure decision).


Remember to assume good faith in your tone the participants may well intend to help by doing what they think is frække mms billeder massage assens right. quot;ng page content in the deletion summary may be helpful, but must not be done for attack content or copyrighted text. Disambiguation pages excluding redirects. Relisting debates repeatedly in the hope of getting sufficient participation is not recommended, and while having a deletion notice on a page is not harmful, its presence over afrikansk massage uppsala eskort several weeks can become disheartening for its editors. If the nomination has received very few or no comments but appears controversial to the closing administrator, or has been declined for proposed deletion in the past, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgement. Closures may only be reopened by the closer themselves, an uninvolved administrator in their individual capacity, giving their reasoning, or by consensus at deletion review. Not delete) a page, though not necessarily in its current form. Non-administrators closing discussions Further information: Wikipedia:Non-admin closure In general, administrators are responsible for closing deletion discussions, but non-administrators who are registered (i.e. If unsure, report as usual for suspected sock-puppetry, and indicate your concern and reason in the debate for the closer and future participants, but in a way that addresses the debate rather than attacking the user. The deletion process encompasses the processes involved in implementing and recording the community's decisions to delete or keep pages and media. The nominator is banned, so their edits are not to be retained. Reasons for deletion Starting a discussion Speedy process Closing instructions Templates for discussion (TfD) Pages in the Template : and Module : namespaces, excluding stub templates, userboxes, and redirects. Never close a discussion as a wrong venue without opening a discussion at an appropriate one. However, in this case, the article can be restored for any reason on request. Common options include, but are not limited to: relisting the discussion (see the section ' Relisting discussions closing as "no consensus" with no prejudice against speedy renomination ( npasr closing in favour of the nominator's stated proposal; soft deleting the article. Of a redirect or trivial content at the target page name) or merger. This similarly applies to deletion nominations as well; if no editor suggests that the corresponding article should be kept, then redirection is an option. Note 2 Reasons for deletion Starting a discussion Speedy process: prod, CSD Closing instructions Categories for discussion (CfD) Categories and stub templates. These include commenting yourself, rather than closing, or extending the period of discussion, noting this is done due to concerns and to allow other editors to comment. Userfy Articles, templates, miscellaneous pages This would move the page into the creator's userspace so that they may make improvements. Before deleting a page through the speedy deletion process, verify that it meets at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion, check the page history to assess whether it would instead be possible to revert and salvage a previous version and to determine whether. Close calls and controversial decisions are better left to admins. The deletion process is not a forum for policy concerns. Merge votes should be specific and clear. Reasons for deletion Starting a discussion Speedy process Closing instructions Redirects for discussion (RfD) Redirects in any namespace. Normally, a deletion discussion must be held to form a consensus to delete a page. Scripts such as User:Evad37/XFDcloser automate the process.


Rosa sidan eskort sluta jobbet dikt

  • Thaimassage örebro happy ending thai örnsköldsvik
  • Sensuell massage helsingborg massage haninge
  • Svenska porrfilmer tube svensk porr xxx
  • Thaimassage gävle birka massage
  • Damer porr sexiga äldre kvinnor

Gratis sex dejting thai kristineberg

However, if at the end of the initial seven-day period, the discussion has only a few participants (including the nominator and/or it seems to be lacking arguments based on policy, it may be appropriate for the closer to relist it, to solicit further discussion. Deletion requested by subject Deletion discussions concerning biographies of living persons who are relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus to keep, may be closed as 'delete' per the deletion policy and BLP policy (request for. Also remember that nobody is obligated to close a discussion, nor is it crucial that a discussion be closed immediately once its week-long run has ended. Non-administrators should limit their closes to outcomes they have the technical ability to implement; for example, non-admins should not close a discussion as delete, because only admins can delete pages. It can sometimes be useful to provide a brief explanatory note, to make the rationale for the decision clear this is especially true in heated and high public profile cases, or where many views will be given little weight (or a few views given substantial. This can happen at AFD especially, if the article could be suitable for Wikipedia, but is created under an inappropriate title, and was nominated for deletion, but consensus agrees it is fixable if the title is changed. WhatLinksHere may show that the page is an oft-referred part of the encyclopedia, or may show other similar pages that warrant deletion. Retarget Redirects This means that the redirect should lead to a different page. To implement a 'no consensus' outcome: close the deletion discussion as 'no consensus edit the page to remove the deletion notice; and record the outcome on the page's talk page using one of several venue-specific templates (see ' Step-by-step instructions ' for details). Instead, start a discussion on the talk page of the concerned page or at the village pump.